A French court pronounced against Valve in the resale of play

The High Court of Paris voted in favor of the possibility for consumers to resell digital copies of games. Initially, Valve stated that Steam was a service based on a subscription but had been rejected. The evidence has shown that most games consisted of a punctual and non-recurring purchase. This case has been ongoing for a long time, almost four years, first of all committed by the UFC Consumer Rights Association-than Choose.

In the end, it is the legislation of the European Union that led to the change because of the laws protecting the computer programs. Most of the problems in the case concerned the lack of physical copies to resell. The Court finally decided that a game sold with the author's authorization meant that it could not claim any resale.

Until Valve accepts the decision, it incurs a fine of 3,000 euros a day, up to six months. Although this does not represent a lot of money for valve, the policy has changed after a trial. After losing a case in Australia, Valve relaxed his reimbursement policy and had to pay a fine of $ 2.4 million.

Asked about the final result, Doug Lombardi Valve responded to the request for commentary from PC Gamer by the following comment: "We do not subscribe to the decision of the Court of First Instance of Paris and will appeal. The decision will have no effect on Steam until the case is on appeal. "

Despite the fines and the decision, there does not seem to be immediate future change for Steam. There is no way to know what will be the future recourse or if valve will have to change its policy. This is not the first time the Company is opposed to European legislation. This is one of the many cases surrounding video game companies and their relationships with consumers and that could report new changes.

What do you think of the resale of games? Should it only be physical or digital? Let us know in the comments!

Source.